|
Interview by
Peter Hinsby and Anders Fogh Jensen
You have analyzed what you termed
the psy – sciences. Medicine is undoubtedly part of this discourse, but
during the last couple of years there seems to be a shift in your focus to
the new medical technologies or life-sciences. Why this shift and why now?
Rose: "I’ve been working on psychiatry for
quite a long time. After my PhD thesis, "The psychological complex",
was published in 1985, my next book was an initial analysis of the
contemporary role of psychiatrists in regulating pathological – and normal -
conduct. That book – an edited collection - was called "The Power of
Psychiatry". One of the driving forces of the pieces in that book
was to argue that the opposition between psychiatry and antipsychiatry
wasn’t helpful – it wasn’t helpful just to be against psychiatry, or against
one type of psy - psychiatry in favour of another - psychological
intervention, or to see psychiatry as wholly a project of incarceration, of
enclosure, of control. Together with my co-editor Peter Miller, I argued
that such analyses in terms of social control were rather limited ways of
trying to understand the role of psychiatry and its forms of expertise in
contemporary societies. Instead of thinking about psychiatry as basically a
carceral project to remove troublesome elements from society, I argued that
one should see psychiatry as part of a far more general set of strategies to
promote and manage mental health – I called this ‘ the discipline of mental
health.’ "
Read the entire interview at Turbulens.net
|